Archive for February 27th, 2008

Despite the fact that previously attempted ISP-level filtering technology failed, the Australian government will go ahead with a plan to implement such filtering, starting with a trial in Tasmania. The Government will spend $89 million to deploy the filtering system in hopes of protecting youngsters from accessing X-rated material. (For illustrative purposes only: the initiative […]

ausxxx

Despite the fact that previously attempted ISP-level filtering technology failed, the Australian government will go ahead with a plan to implement such filtering, starting with a trial in Tasmania. The Government will spend $89 million to deploy the filtering system in hopes of protecting youngsters from accessing X-rated material. (For illustrative purposes only: the initiative was announced at an event held by the Australian Christian Lobby.) So, the Government will spend lots of money on a program that doesn’t work. I know the water drains “backwards” down there, but is logic also reversed in Australia?

ISPs will have a blacklist. Try to access a site on the blacklist and you’ll be denied a connection. Even more annoying, the filter will be on by default, meaning if you want to see what you want to see you’ll have to call your ISP to get an unfiltered connection.

I don’t know, it seems that teaching your kids from an early age what’s acceptable in your house would be a lot cheaper and more effective long-term than such filtering technique, but I’m not a politician who has interests to please.

Australia moving ahead with plans to erect ISP porn filters [Ars Technica]

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

I used to test laptops en masse at Laptop Magazine and I’m well aware of the various problems with the testing methods available. Your battery test — playing a DVD over and over to recreate the experience on a plane, for example — might be different from mine — watching furry porn in a constant […]

lithiumbatteries.jpg
I used to test laptops en masse at Laptop Magazine and I’m well aware of the various problems with the testing methods available. Your battery test — playing a DVD over and over to recreate the experience on a plane, for example — might be different from mine — watching furry porn in a constant loop while Twittering college students. That stated, there has been some lip service paid to the severe dip in battery life in the latest Penryn Pros and I’m glad Apple has to cojones to change its testing method.

When we see battery life, we usually see ideal case life. This often means the laptop is doing nothing, sitting in a climate controlled room at lowest brightness. If that were the case, all of our laptops could get 10 hours with a tiny prodding. Apple, however, is now testing wireless productivity — which cuts lots of battery life — along with a number of other tests that improve accuracy but drive down scores. While this seems obvious, a number of OEMs don’t do this out of fear of deflating their numbers. Sometimes their claims of long life are true — IBM, now Lenovo, often had laptops with great life. In fact, I’ve seen laptops that lasted 8 hours or more on one charge. However, most of their claims are sadly false. Hopefully this will bring some truth back into the testing regimen.

More MacBook details: battery life claims, enviro push, more [AppleInsider]

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

The Sony MDR-NC500D Digital Noise Canceling Headphones cost $400. While that might seem like a lot of money, I can only suggest to you that these headphones are akin to sliding a stick of warm, melty butter into each ear — not in the sense that sticking butter in your ears would likely impede […]

sonyheadphones

The Sony MDR-NC500D Digital Noise Canceling Headphones cost $400. While that might seem like a lot of money, I can only suggest to you that these headphones are akin to sliding a stick of warm, melty butter into each ear — not in the sense that sticking butter in your ears would likely impede your hearing, but more in the sense that butter is delicious and if you could somehow replicate the taste of butter as an aural sensation, it’d perhaps be something like using these headphones.

Overview

The main feature that differentiates these headphones from other noise canceling headphones is that these ones cancel the noise digitally. Using a relatively straightforward process, there’s a little microphone built into the headphones that samples the surrounding ambient noise and creates an opposite waveform to block out that sound.

diagram

It works really well, too. I initially tested the headphones in a relatively quiet room with a ceiling fan rotating at the highest setting. The whir of the fan was masked handsomely when I put the headphones on. It actually felt kind of weird. Oh, and the airplane too. Man, are these things great on the airplane. Not until you take them off do you realize how loud those engines are. It’s almost overwhelming to come back into audio reality after a three hour flight. I found myself sometimes wearing these without listening to any music — I just used them to block out the airplane noise.

What’s Included?

You get a lot of stuff, to be sure. There’s an overly large zip-up carrying case, a detachable headphone cord, a power adapter, another cord/adapter combo that’s juiced by two AA batteries, an old-school airplane arm rest adapter, and a small-to-large headphone jack adapter. I expected to be able to just open the box and start playing around but I found having to sort through everything first.

sonyheadphones1

The headphones have an internal lithium-ion battery that needs to be charged before the first use. Once charged, you should be able to get about 16 hours before needing to recharge. If you find yourself without access to a power outlet, you can use the included AA battery adapter to get another 12 or so hours.

Performance

As I noted, the actual noise cancellation aspect works wonderfully. There’s a “monitor” button on the side of the right earpiece that allows you to temporarily turn off the noise cancellation so you can compare the two environments. There’s also an “AI NC MODE” button that you can press that’ll cause the headphones to analyze the ambient noise wherever you are and adjust accordingly. Very cool.

Listening to music sounds pretty good, although not quite as great as you might expect from a pair of $400 headphones. My iPod Touch sounded a bit muddy at first, with the kick drum of Fall Out Boy’s “THNKS FR TH MMRS” popping and distorting to the point that I had to change the EQ preset from Rock to Spoken Word, of all settings. It was the only one where the bass didn’t overpower everything else. Once that part was tweaked, everything sounded pretty good. Seasoned audiophiles might not be as forgiving but given how well these things block everything else out, I can let an initial EQ adjustment slide. Movies and video podcasts have sounded fine, too.

Value

This is where things might get a little sticky. The headphones are $400. Are they worth it? I certainly wouldn’t spend $400 on headphones even if they were actually made of real butter but I’m not that uppity about my music. I was chatting with audio expert Mike Kobrin about the headphones and mentioned that I liked them and he didn’t throw a tantrum like an audio expert would normally do if someone were to suggest that inferior headphones were, in fact, good. So that’s something.

I also tested these headphones against my Dad’s Bose noise canceling headphones which were originally offered at $400 and I found that Sony’s sounded markedly better. I could hear an audible noise-canceling hiss from the Bose, but there’s no such hiss from the Sony headphones. It’s almost like a sound vacuum. Like anti-sound.

So, should you pay $400? That depends. I think someone who wants to get his or her first pair of noise canceling headphones would definitely be impressed. The kind of people who don’t have a problem spending $400 on headphones, though, might not be. And they’re the ones Sony’s going to have to win over. If I were to spend $400 on these headphones, though, I’d feel like I was getting my money’s worth.

As with all audio stuff, you should definitely try a pair out first to see how you like them. They’ll be available on March 21st.

Digital Noise Canceling Headphones MDR-NC500D [SonyStyle.com]

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

The PS3’s PlayTV add-on — essentially a DVR for the PS3 — will go on sale in Europe in March for about $150. Not word on US availability. There are also reports that content recorded by PlayTV won’t be copy-protected and that you will be able to drop video onto MPEG-2 compatible devices without […]

scaledplaytv-1.jpgThe PS3’s PlayTV add-on — essentially a DVR for the PS3 — will go on sale in Europe in March for about $150. Not word on US availability. There are also reports that content recorded by PlayTV will not be copy-protected and that you’ll be able to drop video onto MPEG-2 compatible devices without DRM.

Sony stamps on PlayTV date and price listing [GamesIndustry]

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It